Now that the election’s over, we can stop debating tax rates, repealing Obamacare and whether Mitt’s dog rode on the roof of his car. Aside from gun laws now – which DO require serious consideration, the other key issue both Americans and politicians should be focusing on is job creation. One of the key sectors often discussed is “Manufacturing”. Manufacturing means many things, has many implications and I wanted to provide some insight into what it actually means to spend a career in manufacturing, why certain jobs continue to leave, and why some are coming back.
Manufacturing “High Paying Jobs” – One of the oft-quoted reasons manufacturing jobs are viewed as important to the economy is because they are traditionally referred to as “high paying”. In my assessment, this should be qualified with “high paying compared to other jobs with a similar skill level”. So, an engineer working in a manufacturing plant probably makes roughly the same as an engineer working for a design firm, a nuclear plant, or some other employer in the same locale. However, the unskilled labor can tend to make a killing compared to their peers outside the firm. Take a typical entry level blue-collar manufacturing role with a large multinational. You can basically have a high school degree, often with no prior work experience or no relevant experience for that matter, and make double what someone else working minimum wage in town makes. That’s just starting pay. Often times in manufacturing, there are opportunities for overtime which can widen this gap. And if you’re in a union? Forget about it – the disparity is huge. I’m not exaggerating at all, but I used to work in a plant where non-degreed employees were making well into the six figures in their twenties. Granted, they were often working a lot of overtime to do it, but if you’re pumping gas at the local gas station, you can work all the nights and weekends you want but you’re never going to make that kind of money. This translates into a lot of opportunity for people that wouldn’t have had it otherwise, and a lot of money for the local economy.
Manufacturing is NOT Glamorous – In So Many Ways – Aside from the fact that many manufacturing roles entail physical labor, getting dirty, sweaty, possibly injuring yourself, or just not having a cushy “desk job”, it’s usually not the type of job people think of as “cool” or a hot job. Ask a hundred college-aged kids what they want to do for a career and the answers will range from doctors and lawyers to Silicon Valley-types to marketing to the world of high finance to teachers. But you probably won’t hear many say they’re looking forward to a career in manufacturing. I’ll just say in my early years, I missed tons of social events, family events, holidays and basically, some of the best years of my life working. Sometimes, it was voluntary (like getting double time for working the day after Thanksgiving? why not?); whereas some holidays and many a weekend for mandatory since we just didn’t have weekend or holiday coverage. I traded my career and overtime dollars for experiences. I don’t have a ton of regrets and I’m glad I did it when I was young as opposed to having the same type of direct oversight role as a late thirties dad of three.
Manufacturing That’s Coming and Going –
As you can see, there’s been a long secular trend of declining jobs in manufacturing for decades now. However, with the economy improving slowly, we’re seeing an uptick. There’s the occasional headline like Apple bringing jobs back to the US for some of their units, but that’s purely a gimmick; it’s a few hundred jobs, while each plant that closes takes hundred with it.
The decline in manufacturing jobs isn’t solely due to the proverbial “greedy corporations” but there are numerous causes. For one, productivity continues to increase substantially year over year, meaning it requires fewer workers to produce the same output. We can thank technology, robotics, innovation, and competition for that. It’s a force that will continue unabated as long as there is innovation and competition in the world. The upside is that many jobs that continue to leave are the least desirable in many respects. We now have robotics for lifting, picking and placing, welding, pushing, pulling, sorting, assembling, inspecting and many other physical jobs that are either dangerous or quite boring. This pushes people into higher complexity roles and/or other careers altogether. You might think we’d be in a constant state of decline, but higher tech manufacturing brings jobs that have higher qualifications, higher pay and often provide employees with greater skills they can take elsewhere than if they were just inspecting widgets for defects on a line for 20 years. The other forces driving jobs into or back to the US are some benefits to doing business in the US. Namely, very cheap energy costs, being closer to the customer and lower landed costs (total of shipping, avoiding taxes/duties, etc). Even though Americans demand higher wages and now, with Obamacare, higher costs in general, this can still be offset by having a shorter supply chain, reduced inventory, lower transportation costs, avoiding some of the quality and timeline problems in dealing with China, India, Vietnam, etc. Just look at what’s going on with the port strikes. If you’re manufacturing in the midwest, you don’t have to contend with importing finished product into the US. While there are many headwinds, there are some things we still have going for us – for the people who want to make a career in manufacturing.
Related Articles
If you enjoyed this post, you can get free updates through RSS Feed or via Email whenever a new post is published. Rest assured that you can unsubscribe at any time via the automated system and your information will not be sold, archived or utilized for any other "nefarious" purposes.
{ 2 comments }
I used to work in a plant where non-degreed employees were making well into the six figures in their twenties
You are so full of crap, this is a joke right? Seriously, a joke? There is no WAY a person working on the manufacturing floor of a company is making over $100K, I am sorry, but there just is not that person, and if there was, the company CEO would be out of a job, you know that as well as I do. Come on now, if you are going to write an article, and use a straw man, at least use one that has a shred of being true, this farce is just outright slander.
Jeff Reply:
June 3rd, 2014 at 12:35 pm
@Michael Harris,
Michael, you’re an idiot that has no idea what you’re talking about. As someone that works at a manufacturing site in Texas, the general operators (w/ just a high school degree) for the most part make more than our engineers and with OT, many of them easily clear $100k a year. For whatever reason, no one wants to be an operator or is qualified to be one thus the high wages.
Umm, you’re full of crap Mike aka know-it-all. And you’re so ignorant, you’re throwing around the word “slander”? Do you even know what that means? Who was slandered?
Regarding what people make in US mfg plants, how the heck would you know? Are you the omnipotent salary repository for all US employees? There are all kinds of jobs in the US where someone with a college degree can be making six figures in their twenties. Granted, it’s usually not a typical market force, but a union involved (which I outlined), but the examples abound. But to the point –
a) why would I fabricate that? What do I have to gain? You tell me. I have no motive to fabricate salaries and there’s nothing even really controversial or groundbreaking in this article. It could have been written without that statement to make the same point. Maybe you have a theory.
b) I know for a fact what people were making for a few reasons. Primarily, it was common knowledge at our site how ridiculous both the pay and the overtime hours were. The amount of overtime being thrown around was causing all kinds of fighting about whether we “skipped” someone, or didn’t follow the union rules, grievances, etc. As a result, we used to work on different ways to reduce OT but we had to get sr. management’s attention. In order to do so, we listed out the top take-home pay for some habitual OT takers and, well, the numbers were astounding. We had some well into the six figures. They worked a ton, but they were making it. Further to this point, a ritual our union guys used to partake in was to brag in the break room when they got the first paycheck where they broke the FICA cap (meaning they no longer had to pay taxes on it). They’d be holding this ritual earlier and earlier each year. Knowing the that cap is now 113K, going back 5 years, 8 years, 10 years, it was still close to 100K or just below. So, if you’re breaking the FICA cap in September, you’re clearly making over 100,000, even if the cap was like 90K that year. I could go on, but bottom line is, you think you know much more than you do.
As far as firing CEO, when you’re the head of a multinational with thousands of employees, you don’t actually keep track of how much overtime a guy 12 levels below you is making. When your margins are 90%+, overtime costs tend to be ignored. It used to drive me nuts and we made inroads in reducing OT, but if you knew anything about manufacturing biologics and union rules, the two don’t mix. Union rules are very rigid and set to require the most labor and least flexibility possible. Growing living organisms is very complex and variable. They don’t always do what you think. So, you have massive peaks and valleys in your manufacturing process. No matter how much screwing around with shifts and stacking labor across the right shifts, the process always gets delayed at some point and you end up having to react with massive OT shift coverage. Throw in some shift differentials, holiday coverage at 2-3X pay, and boom – six figures.
Comments on this entry are closed.