A few years back, I wrote an Article for Project Managers which got some pretty good feedback so I thought I’d go back and draw from a few more years of experience in the role and share some more insight.  And by the way, while you may not be a Project Manager by title, virtually all of us use some facet of project management in our jobs or everyday life, so the same lessons may well apply.  Whether you’re trying to manage the order and execution of building your dream home or trying to figure out how to get your 3 kids 3 different places at the same time, people from all walks of life draw on similar skill sets and experience to manage schedules and others.  Here’s some more insight aside from the basics provided in the last article:

  • Cover Action Items at the Close of a Meeting – One of my early learnings was that while I may have been issuing some really comprehensive and timely minutes following meetings, the action items I put in the minutes weren’t always getting done in between meetings.  When we’d come to the next meeting and revisit open items, some members would say, “Oh, I saw that in the minutes and didn’t know what that meant” or something along those lines.  To avoid this recurring loop of either genuine or feigned misunderstandings, just set aside the final 3-4 minutes of a meeting for recapping the action items.  Call out the responsible person or function by name and summarize the action as you understand it and get a verbal confirmation back from them that they’re on the same page.  This greatly eliminates misunderstandings in between meetings and avoids the need for constant followup and repeating items outside the meeting slots.

 

  • Phone Calls Beat Emails Almost Every Time – I’m sometimes amazed (and frustrated) by the number of times a single topic can be volleyed back and forth across email, with Reply All along the way, without the issue actually being resolved.  Likewise, when someone isn’t completing an action, you can send all the emails you want but it doesn’t get the same response as a phone call.  While phone calls can be annoying in that they shouldn’t be required and you don’t always get someone on the other line, when you do get them, I find that issues are resolved much more quickly.  Additionally, many people (especially in cultures outside the US) actually expect and respect phone calls over email.  They find email to be very informal and sometimes rude if used exclusively whereas a phone call is a sign of respect and allows for some higher level personal interactions.  I wish it were as easy as launching out emails all over the place to get work done but people just don’t respond the same way.  The sooner you start making more phone calls, the more effective you’ll be.

 

  • Manage by the 80/20 Rule – In my early project management days, I used to set up the intricate MS Project files and try to track and manage hundreds of tasks.  That’s how I was trained after all.  As my workload doubled, then tripled, I had a choice between working a ton of hours to keep up and being buried in the details vs. just doing more with less.  What I found was that most of the fine details just didn’t matter.  I started tracking higher level milestones and holding lead responsible for updating on status (on track, delayed, risks, opportunities), rather than trying to track the 10 sub-tasks beneath that milestone myself.  There was really no reason for me to understand if and when each protocol was signed, if each study was completed or 5 interim steps in filing a product in a new market.  I needed the key milestones only.

 

  • Be A TimeClock Dictator – Precious meeting time can be eaten away with one or two people having a pissing contest over who knows more or who can speak more eloquently on a topic.  Often times, the same topics come up meeting after meeting and continue to be rehashed or people bring up topics that aren’t appropriate or directly related to the meeting goal.  As the project manager, you need to nip this in the bud and suggest that we need to move on due to time constraints.  Common phrases used to shuffle people along are to, “take it offline”, “revisit later if time permits”, or “add it to the parking lot”, the parking lot being a laundry list of items that came up that require further discussion but were unresolved.  The risk in not keeping your meeting on track is that you miss all the key items in the back part of your agenda (possibly your most important) and you have aggravated meeting attendees that sat through a whole discussion on who’s on some committee and when they meet as opposed to actually making decisions or troubleshooting a problem.

 

  • FOLLOW UP! – This is probably the most important item.  I mentioned earlier about emails and phone calls, but in essence, I make it a point to follow up on key items, especially if it’s a team that only meetings bi-weekly or monthly.  A lot of people completely forget or ignore action items outside the meeting except when the know a meeting is right around the corner and they’re going to be put on the spot.  Going a full month longer than was necessary to complete a key activity can add a lot of time to a project, especially when a lot of tasks are inter-related and rely on many different people and groups.  I usually go back to my old minutes in between sessions and run down the open items and followup on key actions that may be on the critical path.  This both keeps us on track and helps inform me on how I should set up my agenda for the next meeting (so we’re not rehashing things that were already completed).

I hope these additional tips and tricks can help make you a more effective project manager, parent, business owner or whatever it is you do that relies on other people in some way.

Do You Have Additional Tips and Tricks?

Share

{ 1 comment }

It’s been a few years running now (2011, 2010) where I pointed out the the contrived beauty and simplicity of the “Lazy Portfolios” regurgitated by MarketWatch’s Paul Farrel ad nauseam is nonsense.  See, these nifty portfolios were set up with the benefit of hindsight and spewed out a few years ago when virtually every asset class was trouncing US stocks (using the S&P500 index as a proxy).  Of course emerging markets, commodities and bonds looked great as US stocks were crashing! Duh.  However, I warned that moving forward, these asset classes are no more likely to beat the US equity indices than random chance.  And I was right. My argument remains the same, but the results are just embarrassing for the proponents of these tools.  What is more embarrassing than the performance though is the complete lack of acknowledgement of their under-performance and lack of utility.  Let me be clear – I’m all for diversification, risk management, investment horizons and all that good stuff.  What I’m criticizing here is the claims of superiority of portfolios which are clearly NOT superior, have not been for years, and are no more likely to be in the future than throwing darts at the ticker section of a newspaper.  Check out this screenshot:

Shameless

Check this out.  Not only did the S&P500 outperform ALL (yes, ALL) of these wonderful portfolios over the 3 year period, but also over the prior year (this spans the timeframe of my posts).  You might tout the .12% difference of the Yale portfolio last year, but consider the higher expense ratios and commissions involved in buying multiple instruments as opposed to simply picking up SPY, one of the lowest-cost ETFs, so for all intents and purposes, SPY also outperformed ALL over the prior 1 year period.  This is what I stated was entirely plausible in last year’s article (Told Ya So) and I’ll probably be writing the same thing next year – that any of these portfolios may or may not beat the S&P500, but they are no more likely to do so, regardless of the claims of the proponents.

Here’s what’s really shameless. Today, with this complete trouncing in clear view, MarketWatch publishes a piece of screed barely worthy of mention were it not for the complete and utter irony contained within “6 Reasons Wall Street Hates Lazy Portfolios“.  Hilariously, there is no mention at all of the performance of the lazy portfolios to the US benchmark, only platitudes chastising investors for NOT following their bad advice.  They make statements like:

  • “Lazy Portfolios give investors a far superior alternative than gambling retirement savings in Wall’s Street’s casino” (umm, no, my 100% US equity exposure in my 401(k) is kicking their ass)
  • “they consistently beat the S&P 500 on a long-term basis” (first off, no they don’t. Next, you used historical returns of top performing asset classes to build them. Hindsight is 20/20)
  • “create a long-term portfolio that wins in bear and bull markets” (That is a lie.  We are in a bull market and NOT a ONE of these portfolios is beating a simple SPY ETF.)
  • “You’ll win, and more important, you’ll have lots of time left to enjoy what really counts: your family, friends, career, sports, hobbies, living life to the fullest.” (No, you’re not winning. And if you spend hours analyzing these stupid portfolios, that’s WAY more time than just buying the US market – 1 fund.  More BS.)

The premise here is not to tell you to avoid diversification.  It is not to tell you to avoid low-fee ETFs and mutual funds.  It is to tell you not to believe everything you read, consider the source (and their motives) and that in general, the mainstream media is completely and utterly full of crap and the sheeple blindly follow.

 

Thoughts?

 

Share

{ 9 comments }

Each time we see gas prices start to move up around $3.50 nationally and higher, the utterly moronic stories start to surface about people siphoning gas out of cars and other seemingly ridiculous thefts.  Here are some gems on the topic:

  • Yes, there is actually a website dedicated solely to gas theft www.gastheft.com.  Incredible. The front page has a picture of a woman forced to wear a sign for stealing gas.  It doesn’t appear to be very active or current, but it’s funny nonetheless.  Here’s some more recent stuff:
  • Tutorials on Stealing Gas abound as well.  Here’s an example with step by step instructions, not to mention various YouTube videos.  Gotta love free speech on the internet I suppose.
  • Even Pro Athletes are doing it!  This Philadelphia Eagles running back was charged with stealing $15,000 in gas.
  • Desperate Much?  So, the latest is taking gas theft to a whole new level.  Rather than stealing from gas stations or even siphoning out of cars without gas cap locks, now thieves are resorting to drilling holes in gas tanks.  It sounds like a pretty dirty business, risky and how the heck do they even know if the car has much gas in it!?  Imagine if that ingenuity and effort were put into just getting a job?

Gas isn’t the only hot commodity in recent years.  Copper! Last year, we saw a rash of headlines about people stealing copper from all sorts of venues ranging from cell phone towers to someone pulling off a massive heist by removing 10,000 feet of copper wire underground in CA!

Penny Hoarding to Get Rich – I came across a real interesting phenomena where people are hoarding older pennies which have a higher copper concentration (ABC).  While hoarding them is not illegal, melting them down is.  So for now, they hoard and wait – until we possibly abolish the penny someday, at which point the payoff could be huge!

On one hand, I tend to wonder if the media has just been running with these stories more due to a slow news cycle and the general tone of the economy or if these types of thefts have always been just as prevalent.  If it is the economy, it begs the question, what is the threshold or tipping point to cause one to steal gas or copper or anything else besides cash for that matter?  (Cash is cash and there have always been thieves but some of these new types of commodity theft seem to be more trouble than they’re worth!).

 

Are You Aware Of Other Weird Thefts That Aren’t Common Historically?

Share

{ 4 comments }

facebook-ipo

Thanks, I'll Pass

Friday, news broke that Facebook was preparing to file papers for an IPO possibly as early as next Wednesday.  While just about everyone is ON Facebook, many people probably haven’t considered all the reasons this will be a bad investment for retail investors trying to jump in after the open.  Here are just a few concerns I have that are worth thinking about:

Why Now? Facebook is projecting a Billion Dollar profit in the coming year.  Why do they need to raise equity through an IPO now?  They don’t.  Owners are selling out.  Clearly, they should have gone public last year when all the other social networking and web companies were doing so at richer valuations.  On that…

Valuation - Presently, they’re valuing the company at “$75-100Billion” for the IPO.  Well, that’s a pretty wide range and pretty alarming when Facebook was fetching valuations of $100 Billion last year for private equity raises and on the secondary market.  So, if they value the company at say, $85Billion next week, that’s saying the bubble is already deflating.  You want to be and the losing side of that curve?

The Company You Keep -Speaking of all the peer companies that went public over the past year or two, how have they done post-IPO?  Well, to name a few, Pandora (P) is down 20% from its IPO price, LinkedIn (LNKD) is down 19%, and Yandex (YNDX) is down a whopping 47%.  Well, Facebook’s different, right?  They’re all different companies.  But they all have one thing in common – they are in the fast-growing, “hot and hip” segment which all went public to great fanfare, at a point when valuations were boosted by public sentiment, and then flopped.  Meanwhile, the market at large has been hot lately, so this performance is even more alarming in that light.

Growth Rate – Facebook’s huge.  So, where are they going to get all the growth they’re going to need to justify the valuation?  Probably not through subscriber growth!  It’s already a mature company and that curve is flattening out.  So, will it be better monetization?  Maybe, but if it impacts the user experience, that will be detrimental long-term.

Personally, I would have loved to have been able to invest on the secondary market years ago, wouldn’t we all?!!

 

Are You Investing in Facebook?

 

 

Share

{ 9 comments }

The other day, a friend sat down at my wife’s table at a kids’ school function and seemed a bit sad and said, “Well, now that you all know what my husband makes…that’s how my day’s going”.  My wife and the others at the table actually didn’t know what her husband made (until she made mention of it!), but the premise was that the newspaper had just published the salary of every teacher in the entire school district.  Her husband is a teacher in the district and she feels a bit sheepish or upset I suppose that everyone in her social circles, parents of kids her child goes to school with and even older school kids savvy enough to look the information up all know what their teachers make per year.

Rationale for Publishing Teacher Salaries

My wife is a teacher (on leave while home with the kids, but I’m relatively familiar with teacher issues as a result) and personally, it wouldn’t bother me much if her salary were published because with enough digging, one can usually discern roughly what a teacher makes anyway based on years of service, whether or not they have a Master’s degree, etc. from the school contract.  However, it’s not definitively published in a list for all to see.  Secondly, my wife isn’t the sole breadwinner of the family, so what she makes really provides little bearing or insight into our family income.  In the case of this family, the woman’s husband is the sole worker in the family, so now everyone knows what they make.  This seems to be a mixed practice depending on district so I was thinking about what the rationale might be:

  • You Work for Us – That’s a common refrain principals and teachers here from angry parents that disagree with a disciplinary action, a policy or otherwise.  Perhaps there’s been some sort of outcry from taxpayers that since school district employees are beholden to the taxpayer, they deserve to have full transparency showing each and every salary.
  • People Could Figure It Out Anyway – Like I mentioned before, a parent that was nosy enough to try to figure out what a particular teacher makes could probably do so by looking at their tenure, degree, etc. and match it up to the schedule in the school contract which is public record.  This is the tradeoff of being in a union.  While it’s virtually impossible to be fired for cause, you all make the same salary no matter what your performance.  It’s all just based on tenure, level of education and that’s it. So, the argument here might be that the district isn’t really revealing anything that parents don’t already have access to – they simply made it more convenient.
  • Retaliation – Another interesting theory (my own), is that I’m aware that there was a pretty contentious debate this past year over renewal of the contract.  Evidently, the teachers actually ended up having to work without a contract for a while because they couldn’t agree on salary increases and healthcare contributions.  This same drama plays out in hundreds of districts each year, but I wonder if, as part of the new contract, this is something the town felt they “could” do, so they did it, to kind of thumb their nose at the teachers for being difficult during the negotiations?  Not sure, but anything’s possible.  See, I just don’t see the rationale for why this info should be made available to the public.

 

Why This Seems Completely Unnecessary

I get that public figures of significance, like mayors, judges, police chiefs and other leaders end up having their salaries published.  This is because, yes, the public is paying their salaries, but also to have some level of accountability and a reality check on what they’re making.  For instance, wouldn’t things start to seem a bit fishy if all the local public leaders were making $300,000 per year while taxes kept skyrocketing each year and public services were being cut back?  It makes for a means to compare salaries against other local municipalities to ensure what you’re paying as a taxpayers is reasonable and comparable to others in your locale.  But individual school teachers?  What’s the point?  Imagine a highschool teacher being called out, criticized or otherwise confronted with his salary information in the middle of class by a punk teenager?  I’d be pretty upset, but hey, it’s public info now!  As much as people pretend salary information doesn’t matter and that they’re about so much more than what they make, the reality is that society places a certain value or judgment on people based on what they make. Corporations do a good job of keeping everyone guessing and not publishing salaries of the rank and file (this also helps to deter employees from complaining about what they make by looking around them).  But what value is served by publishing the specific salary of each and every teacher in a district?  While some people could guess what teachers make if they were so inclined, it’s not until the exact number is published that it becomes a topic for routine conversation and gossip.  Seems to be unnecessary to me.

I’m Interested in Your Thoughts on this and other typical public sector employee salaries

 

Share

{ 9 comments }

Are You Prepared for 5% Annual Returns for Years to Come?

In yet another common refrain from the Bond King Bill Gross, he stated this week (CNBC) that anyone realizing even 5% returns on stocks or bonds should consider themselves in the upper echelon of performers in the years ahead due to the debt issues in the EU and US which are anticipated to restrict growth [...]

Share
Read the full article →

It’s That Time of Year – How to Calculate Your FSA Contribution Amount for 2012

For those of you who have a Flex Savings Account option at work, it’s time to set the total annual allotment for 2012 before the year starts.  I’ve always had mixed emotions about this provision of the tax code.  On one hand, you’re allowed to deduct medical expenses from your income normally subject to federal [...]

Share
Read the full article →

Should Americans with No Kids Be Able “Opt-Out” of School Taxes?

I was at a family gathering this summer and the usual topic of complaining about the ineptitude of local government officials and school boards came up.  That then led to older participants questioning what their tax dollars were being used for and why they’re even paying school taxes to begin with.  It led to an [...]

Share
Read the full article →

I’ll Never Buy Music Again – Except Monthly :>

Throughout my life I’ve gone through a series of various philosophies on music listening, performance and consumption.  As a kid, I was REALLY into  music.  I started playing guitar at about 13, went on to be in various “Battle of the Bands” and other concerts, etc. and was a voracious consumer of rock and metal [...]

Share
Read the full article →
Page 1 of 3512345...102030...Last »